The contract provided for a 42.5% share of the sports betting revenue for the DC Lottery’s tech supplier.Ĭheh outlined that all things the council was told then that a sole source contract would speed up the process and the DC would beat the other jurisdictions “was all nonsense.” She also reminded councilmembers that she had raised doubts about the projected revenue, too. Ward three DC councilmember Mary Cheh played events back to 2019 when the DC Council gave Intralot a district-wide five-year monopoly on mobile sports betting after a $215 million no-bid contract, pointing out that she strongly opposed the move then. And he was not the only one to think that GambetDC’s sportsbook failings so far have been embarrassing for the district. McDuffy was adamant that councilmembers and delegates should rather address the failings than wait for the fortunes to turn around. Getting a greater share of zero is still zero.” Kenyan McDuffy, Chair, DC Council We cannot continue to scapegoat the pandemic, the Federal enclave and say because we get a greater rate of return on revenue, we should stay the course. “From the council’s perspective, this cannot continue. Addressing the Issues Head-OnĪ virtual roundtable meeting Wednesday saw some councilmembers raising their concerns that the current state of failings related to GambetDC, the DC Lottery’s sole provider of sports betting services powered by Intralot, cannot continue. ![]() Members of the Council of the District of Columbia are pondering whether to keep GambetDC’s district-wide mobile betting monopoly or revisit the system to let major sportsbook operators in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |